The Airline Reporting Corporation (ARC) plays a crucial role in regulating how travel agencies issue airline tickets in the United States. Historically, ARC’s Agent Reporting Agreement (ARA) had explicit language forbidding an appointed agency from issuing tickets on behalf of another agency that either lacked ARC accreditation or had its ticketing privileges revoked. This restriction was intended to maintain control and accountability in ticketing transactions but also raised significant legal questions, particularly regarding the potential for antitrust violations through group boycott practices.
Recognizing these concerns, ARC revised the ARA about twelve years ago, removing the clause that prohibited agencies from ticketing for other agencies, regardless of their appointment status. This shift represented a significant change in ARC governance, effectively allowing agencies more flexibility to process tickets on behalf of non-appointed or suspended agencies. Despite this relaxation in ARC’s internal policies, fundamental caution remains necessary, as other regulatory and contractual frameworks influence whether such actions are permissible.
The Distinction Between ARC Rules and Individual Airline Regulations
While ARC oversees the financial clearing and reporting function between travel agencies and airlines, it does not unilaterally govern the commercial relationships agencies maintain with individual carriers. Each airline retains the sovereign right to determine which agencies it will appoint and authorize to issue tickets on its behalf. These carrier appointments are unilateral — airlines can terminate or suspend an agency’s authority at any time, for any reason, or none at all.
This dynamic means that even if ARC rules do not prohibit an agency from ticketing for a non-appointed or suspended agency, individual airlines may maintain stricter conditions internally. These internal policies often dictate which agencies must be authorized before tickets for their products can be issued, creating a layered compliance environment for agencies serving multiple carriers.
American Airlines as a Case Study of Tight Carrier Controls
Among U.S. carriers, American Airlines stands out for imposing exceptionally detailed contractual terms on travel agencies authorized to sell its tickets. As part of an agency’s ARC appointment acceptance, American Airlines requires adherence to a separate and extensive Addendum to Governing Travel Agency Agreements — a lengthy legal document spanning approximately 9,500 words. Section 7 of this addendum addresses “Abusive Practices” directly, explicitly forbidding agents from enabling ticketing or booking activities for other entities whose American Airlines appointment has been suspended or terminated.
This clause essentially prohibits agencies from facilitating bookings via third parties that are not authorized American Airlines agents. This includes scenarios where entities use pseudo city codes (PCCs) or other mechanisms to mask unauthorized selling activity. Violation of this provision risks not only suspension or termination of the offending agency’s appointment with American Airlines but potential collateral damage to ticketing privileges with ARC and broader industry reputation.
Practical Implications and Risk Considerations for Travel Agencies
Given the complexities outlined above, travel agencies must exercise due diligence when approached by third parties seeking to have them issue tickets on their behalf. Even though ARC’s current framework may not explicitly forbid ticketing for suspended or non-appointed agencies, airline rules — especially those of influential carriers like American Airlines — can impose binding prohibitions.
The risk is multifaceted. First, agencies could face termination or suspension by airlines if they violate carrier-specific conditions. Second, an agency’s reputation and its standing with ARC might be jeopardized, indirectly impacting the ability to issue tickets across multiple carriers. Third, compliance breaches could lead to potential legal liabilities, especially if agencies inadvertently enable fraudulent or financially unstable entities to transact airline ticket sales.
Therefore, while ARC rules provide a degree of flexibility, relying solely on them ignores the real-world power individual airlines wield. Agencies should rigorously verify the ticketing authority of any third party before agreeing to handle their fare transactions and closely review carrier-specific contracts and addenda to avoid inadvertent breaches.
The Unavoidable Reality of Carrier Sovereignty Over Appointments
The unilateral and revocable nature of airline appointments underscores a fundamental tension between agency autonomy and carrier control in the travel ecosystem. Airlines’ absolute discretion to suspend or revoke appointments — with minimal required justification — means agencies operate under constant uncertainty when facilitating third-party ticketing arrangements.
In practice, this dynamic fuels a cautious approach within the industry, where agencies favor direct bookings and transparent partnerships. The temptation to ticket on behalf of a financially distressed or terminated agency must be balanced against the clear contractual and reputational risks imposed by carriers. Ultimately, the survival and growth of travel agencies depend as much on navigating these regulatory intricacies prudently as on increasing sales volume.
Leave a Reply