Despite numerous efforts from organizations like Trinity Health and the Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation, publicly traded casino companies such as Caesars Entertainment, Bally’s Corp. and Boyd Gaming have overwhelmingly voted against proposals to study the potential cost savings of implementing smoke-free policies. These organizations argued that indoor smoking poses risks such as higher employee health insurance premiums, increased maintenance costs, and the deterrence of potential customers who do not wish to be exposed to second-hand smoke while gambling.
The boards of directors at Caesars, Bally’s, and Boyd have actively fought to keep these proposals out of proxy materials distributed to shareholders. Despite the Securities and Exchange Commission denying the casinos’ requests, the votes proceeded. Caesars’ board argued that studying nonsmoking policies would not be a productive use of company resources, stating that they take the health of all their customers seriously and implement measures to protect the health of nonsmoking customers in designated smoking areas. The high percentage of votes against the proposal at Caesars’ annual meeting reflects the resistance from casino boards to implement nonsmoking policies.
While the efforts to implement smoke-free policies have faced significant opposition, advocates like Cynthia Hallett from the Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation are encouraged by the progress made. The fact that the proposal garnered support from more than 22% of voting shareholders at Boyd’s annual meeting indicates a growing awareness of the importance of addressing smoking in indoor public spaces. Hallett emphasizes that this issue is crucial for the health and well-being of both employees and guests at these establishments.
Smoking has long been a prevalent aspect of the gambling scene, with Las Vegas casinos traditionally allowing smoking since their inception. While most areas in Nevada hotels have been smoke-free since 2006, casinos have continued to permit smoking on gaming floors. However, some casinos, like Park MGM, have taken a different approach by banning smoking in all indoor areas. This policy was implemented following the closure of the property in 2020 due to the pandemic. Park MGM’s commitment to providing a smoke-free environment sets it apart from other major casino resorts on the Las Vegas Strip.
The debate surrounding smoking policies in casinos ultimately boils down to the impact on public health. Second-hand smoke poses significant risks to both employees and guests, and implementing smoke-free policies can help mitigate these health hazards. While there may be initial resistance from casino boards and shareholders, the increasing support for nonsmoking proposals demonstrates a shift towards prioritizing the well-being of individuals within these establishments.
The ongoing efforts to implement nonsmoking policies in casinos highlight the importance of addressing public health concerns related to indoor smoking. As advocates continue to push for change, it is crucial for casino companies to consider the long-term benefits of creating smoke-free environments for their employees and customers. By prioritizing public health and safety, casinos can contribute to a healthier and more enjoyable experience for all individuals who visit their establishments.